By: Agung Virdianto
The writer is a Graduate student and the Community of Comparative Studies Studies of Political Science
Abstract:
The presence of Perpu Organization has reaped the imbalance from a group of children of the nation who seemed to see the State has seized the democracy which is still in process. If it is solved more deeply that the current process of democracy is more protective of heterogeneous society in Indonesia.
Pancasila democracy can not be exclusive but more highly inclusive to actualize, absorb and communicate with all aspirations that arise and develop in society.
The phenomenon can be traced from the decade of political development in Indonesia. Evidence of the authenticity of the history of the Indonesian nation from the three phases of political development (Orla, Orba and Reformasi), that the NKRI is still firmly established to date.
However, there are those who criticize the Public Order Organization (Perpu Ormas) which regard the state as suppressing the freedom of unity and gathering or assessing the decline in democratic development, presumably raising the feast, from which perspective see Indonesia has abandoned the spirit of democracy with the Pancasila?
Keywords: Pancasila Democracy, Contemplation, Power Distribution.
Our democracy, the title of a book written by Hatta as thick as 35 pages which contains Hatta's criticism of Sukarno who is considered to have deviated from the ideals of democracy.
Sukarno was not entirely mistaken in the development of the political system in the era of 1945 until 1965, if likened to a cook cook all recipes of democracy must be processed to be served to customers whose cuisine is a sense of democracy that can be enjoyed and give a positive effect on the public.
And what happens from parliamentary, liberal and presidential democracy that ultimately returns to the Pancasila democratic system.
So also in the issue of leadership between Soekarno and Suharto who have karekteristik differences but there is a greater national interest in the perspective of long term that is still maintaining NKRI and Ideology Pancasila. The inheritance of the Pancasila ideology keyword becomes a mandate that must be maintained by the leader of this Republic.
Pancasila democracy has opened wide in the space of freedom of association and gathered reflected freedom of the press as a public space to participate in nationality and state and the enactment of multi parties in the 1999 elections that run until now with the perfection of the rules of the Election Law. Even Pancasila democracy tolerated the 1945 amendment, related to state institutional relations which focused on the power-sharing aspect and aspects of the nature of relations among state institutions.
This momentum marks the remarkable development of democracy in Indonesia in the Pancasila democracy climate. Changes that lead to positive things and for the benefit of the nation and state are not an issue for Pancasila democracy.
Now the problem becomes strange, when a group of intensive nation boys campaigned titled state muzzle freedom of association and gathered only due to ideology problems that they stretcher encourage the establishment of the state based on the Islamic Shari'a formally with the highest leadership in the hands of the Khalifah. Such intention can not be accommodated by the State since the issuance of the Perpu on CSOs. Various entrapment of thought tried to confuse public opinion post publication Perpu Ormas from spectrum correction section by article until entering into politic area existence of interest of ruler in contest presidential election 2019.
Whereas stage to process and make Perpu has been measured and deeply contemplated by policy makers, that people is a component of the nation's children who must be protected from the attack of ideological virus that is against the Pancasila and history has repeatedly noted that ideological conflict plunged Indonesia into civil war like the PKI had ever done.
The momentum of the Perpu of CSOs is far from the spirit of power or opposing religions with ideology but there is one factor in the strength of the spirit of a nation building its model of democratic system adapted to historical records.
Bhinneka Tunggal Ika for Indonesia and Unity in Diversity for America. This means that on each side of the population retains attachment with each subculture such as tribe, area, race and religion and there are customs.
On the other hand, the whole population has the same basic attachment and purpose. The same basic form of attachment to democratic institutions, mutual trust and the coexistence of coexistence and peaceful living.
Instead the same goal is the development of all potentials of the individual to the maximum and achieve the welfare of its members. In other words, the attachment of the population to a homogeneous subculture or homogeneous uniform will result in conflict (conflict) but attachment to the base and purpose based on historical experience and adhering to a heterogeneous ideology will give rise to a consensus.
In the distribution of power allocation of pancasila democracy system, the contemplation of the distribution of power in society to create the policy of Perpu is on the right track. Very strongly inspired by the Chairman of the Indonesian Council of Ulama KH Ma'ruf Amin, a deeply rooted Islamic-based Islamic Society in Indonesia as well as 14 dominant Islamic and inter-ethnic and religious organizations, supported the government's decision to revoke the legal status of HTI and for him HTI has the right to sue The decision through the court if he is not anti Pancasila.
Ruangpun dialogue open wide by the State that HTI can take legal path through the Constitutional Court in solving the problem.
Revocation of HTI legal body status has passed legal technical stages and in the spriti to maintain the quality of democracy.
So what kind of democracy has not yet been given by the State to its citizens who have clearly violated the rule of life of the nation and the state against the ideology of Pancasila, but still given the opportunity to re-correct the policy of the State, which certainly represents the aspirations of all walks of life that are harmonious in Nature of Pancasila democracy.
It is now time for the greatest elements of society to be the authoritative allocation of the power distribution sections awaiting the real and objective step of the political power of the Political Parties in the parliament, being wise and wise in supporting the steps of the State which has issued the Perpu Ormas.
